electoral politics

Jul 092008
 

I remember thinking, back during the 1964 presidential campaign, before I was of draft age, when Barry Goldwater was being portrayed as a warmonger who would blow up the world along with little girls and their daisies, that Lyndon Johnson would be getting us deep into war in Vietnam. I had no idea how bad it would be, but if peace comes through strength, I figured Johnson would be getting us into war. He would of necessity have to do the things he was accusing Goldwater of wanting to do.

I’m definitely having a sense of deja vu this summer, 44 years later. I’m no fan of George Bush’s warmongering, but Barak Obama seems to be following in the same rut that Lyndon Johnson made. From an article by Bret Stefens in the WSJ:

Now Mr. Obama tells us that the 16-month timeline is contingent on (1) “[making] sure that our troops are safe and that Iraq is stable” (my emphasis), and (2) the opinion of “the commanders on the ground.” Also in question is the size of the “residual force” that the Illinois senator envisions for Iraq after the bulk of U.S. forces is withdrawn. Will it be an embassy guard, plus some military advisers and special-ops forces? Or, as suggested in a March paper by Colin H. Kahl, who runs Mr. Obama’s working group on Iraq, an “overwatch force” of between 60,000 and 80,000 soldiers?

Jul 042008
 

This article inspired me to see if the domain name swiftbloggers.com is available. The old Swift Boaters have such piddling amounts of money to spend on their work, and I don’t have much to add. And I’m not interested in supporting the McCain campaign. I don’t think I’ll even vote for him. (I got in the habit of not voting for his type when I didn’t vote for Bush – twice.)

But I could come up with ten dollars for a domain name to honor the work of democracy as was undertaken by the Swift Boaters four years ago.

Unfortunately, the name is already taken.

SwiftBicyclers.com might be a good alternative, except that my riding is far from swift.

Jun 262008
 

Over at townhall.com there is an article by a Christopher Wills titled “Obama record shows a liberal open to compromise.”

And what are the examples of how Obama has ever been open to compromise and where he departed even a tiny bit from hardline left positions? There are none.

The only substantive examples show an unwillingness to compromise one iota, for example on abortion.

Towards the end of the article there is this statement: “While Obama could compromise on crime and gun control, he didn’t budge when it came to abortion.”

But examples of actual compromise on those issues are nowhere to be found. The article does tell us that Obama “worked with” the law enforcement community on some of their concerns. But what “concerns” those were is left unstated.

If you look at the actual record as described in that article, or anywhere else, you have a candidate who is uncompromising in his mission to grow the welfare-police state.

Jun 062008
 

Burt Prelutsky: “Barack sends Michelle out to make speeches and give interviews, but when her words suggest a certain note of bitterness, racism and disaffection for America, Mr. Obama tells us we’re not supposed to take her to task. Well, Senator, if I recall correctly, you also think your spiritual advisor and your good friends, a corrupt lobbyist and an unrepentant terrorist, should be left out of the equation. So, on exactly what basis would you have us consider your qualifications to be our president?”

Why Obama Must Go to Iraq (Pete Hegseth in the WSJ): Obama says these trips are just “stage-managed productions designed to obfuscate, not illuminate. … That Mr. Obama apparently doubts his ability to distinguish spin from reality, and to draw bad news out of subordinates, does not bode well for his possible future as our nation’s chief executive.” And I might add that this is also the person who says he would talk with the leaders of Iran and other thug states, right away, without preconditions. But to meet with Americans in Iraq, he wants preconditions.

May 212008
 

I really, truly did LOL at this one from the Postmodern Conservative, about the idea that with Hillary as Vice President, Bill could be appointed to her Senate seat.

‘Two for the price’ of one sucked eggs back in 1992. Without Hillary, Bill would have avoided both of the signature embarrassing failures of his Presidency: health care and adultery. Like the boy on the playground who’s a little too old for his grade, there is no safe public place to put Bill Clinton; he will always be looking for someone’s sandbox to traipse through, some game of hopscotch to mess up, some skirt on the monkeybars to find himself standing under.

Maybe it struck me as funny now because back in the day I used to compare Bill Clinton’s thugs to playground bullies who push little kids to the ground and taunt them for not being able to stand up and walk.

May 192008
 

McCain is true to form, sharpening his knives for carrying out his administration’s agenda, which will be to stab conservatives in the back at every opportunity.

But what to make of James Dobson, who wants to have a private meeting with him. Dobson has already indicated he won’t support McCain. What difference would a meeting make? Does Dobson want McCain to tell him special things in secret that he won’t say in public? Does he want some secret agreement? Is he willing to sell his vote and his support in exchange for some secret promise?

Religious leaders would be better off not endorsing candidates, anyway. They lose their moral credibility even when they support good candidates, because sometimes those candidates are going to do things they should not be part of. They can instead speak out on principles, e.g. the value of human life, and then let their followers learn how to incorporate those principles in their lives by deciding for themselves what to do at the ballot box. That’s how to create a strong movement that has deep roots.

Here’s from Novak’s article:

An invitation for Sen. John McCain to meet with evangelical leader James Dobson at his Focus on the Family headquarters in Colorado Springs, Colo., so far has been rebuffed by the McCain campaign.

Dobson has indicated he cannot support McCain for president. His opposition reflects continued resistance to the prospective presidential nominee among Christian conservatives. They take issue with McCain’s current positions on stem cell research, immigration and global warming, as well as his past sponsorship of campaign finance reform.

May 082008
 

So John Schwartz has threatened to run against Tim Walberg as a Democrat. It figures.

I learned about it from Pat Toomey’s article in the WSJ titled, “In Defense of RINO Hunting.” And to think, Tommey gets criticized on the grounds that he shouldn’t do anything to get Republicans unelected.

Here’s what I wrote about John Schwartz just after he got elected in 2004. It was in response to someone who said, “I actually like Specter.” (I’ve edited it slightly and cleaned up my language a bit. Maybe I’m mellowing.) My reply was:

Then I’ll bet you’ll like my new Republican congressman, John Schwartz, who is also a slimy, two-faced, backstabbing [deleted].

My old congressman, Nick Smith, is one who didn’t go along with all of Bush’s spending plans, so Bush’s people and Delay retaliated, threatening to see to it that his son, who ran for his seat this year, didn’t get elected. Not that Schwartz will support Bush — I don’t think he likes him.

Schwartz, unlike the previous rep, is from my end of the district. I’ve gotten to see a lot more of him than I would like. He made small talk with my youngest son when I took him to an election-night uncelebration 16 years ago. He’s a physician. I know people who were in his graduating high school class. I’ve seen him come out of the operating room to talk to family members in the waiting room. He once got into a parking-lot fist fight with another doctor who [happened to have] been one of my daughter’s physicians. His opponent made use of that episode to sink an earlier run for Congress for him.

But that’s not what makes him a slimy, two-faced, etc. In the early 80s the Republican challenger for congress was a woman named Jackie MacGregor, a slightly crackpot rightwinger. I think she had had a job in the Reagan education department. Anyhow, Jeanne Kirkpatrick had gotten to know her and had promised to campaign for her. I don’t know if she regretted that promise, but she came to our district and there was a $50/plate dinner, the only such event my wife and I ever attended. All the local Republicans were there, and all of them got to say a few words before Kirkpatrick’s speech.

All except John Schwartz. He didn’t want to be on the same platform with Jackie MacGregor, and maybe Kirkpatrick, too, for all I know.

OK, I can understand that. It happens that sometimes one person wants to distance himself from another in the same party. But did he stay away like a decent human being would do? No, he has to have his say too. He comes to the outside door of the hall where were meeting, just off the downtown mall, and stands in the open doorway to say how busy campaigning he was so he was sorry he couldn’t join us, but blah, blah, blah. Instead of just staying out of sight, he has to [go out of his way to] give a visible snub to the candidate. What a lowlife.

Later, when he ran for Congress himself and lost, he waited until AFTER the election was over to tell the newspapers just how much he detested conservative Republicans.

He has been the top guy in the state senate, ran John McCain’s campaign in Michigan, had a run for governor, and now the slimy piece of RINO finally has his national office.

He and Arlen Specter are two of a kind. They suck up to conservatives when they need their votes, and then after they’re safely elected, are the first to turn on them and stab them in the back with their snot setting turned up to high.

Was I glad when Pat Toomey and the Club for Growth helped defeat him in 2006? You betcha. I would never vote for the guy. In 2004 I cast one of my rare votes for a Democrat in order to vote against Schwartz. If he wants to run as a Democrat, fine. He should have done it long ago.

Apr 272008
 

Ok, I’ll bite. Suppose Obama engaged in some serious discussion. Just how would he bring jobs back to Anderson?

If you watched the last few weeks of this campaign, you’d think that all politics is about is negative ads and bickering and arguing, gaffes and sideline issues. There’s no serious discussion about how to bring jobs back, to Anderson.

URL

From the discussion I’ve heard so far, the following are some possibilities:

  • Beggar our Latin American neighbors and try to hoard our stuff?
  • Raise capital gains taxes on job-producing investments?
  • Take money from other Americans so Obama can spend it in Anderson?
  • Try to create hostility among our Latin American neighbors such that we’ll need to grow the military to defend ourselves, and then spend some of those military dollars in Anderson?

Yes, by all means, let’s have a serious discussion about how to bring jobs back to Anderson.

Apr 212008
 

We’ve all heard of waffling politicians, but Barak Obama takes the concept to a new level.

“Why can’t I just eat my waffle?” the Illinois senator said as he ate breakfast in Scranton, Pennsylvania, according to MSNBC television pictures.

Pressed again for an answer, he replied: “Just let me eat my waffle.”

url

Apr 142008
 

This one made me laugh: “It’s hard to take Obama seriously when he employs exaggerations of algorian proportions.” I had already heard of algore, but I hadn’t heard that form of the word before. Time to update the dictionaries. (The quote is from James Taranto’s “Best of the Web Today.”)