The Times implies, without quite saying it, both that it approves of Obama’s evasions (“the United States must take special care”) and that it would approve if he took a different approach (“he may have to speak out more forcefully”). It’s hard to know whether to describe this as a posture of total deference to the president or of complete indifference to the underlying subject.
Everything is connected to everything 
The Reticulator
Bash the Messenger
Why can’t it be both?
06.21.09 | No Comments
speak up
Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site.
Subscribe to these comments.
Subscribe to these comments.
Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.
You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
« Shovel ready
» Weirdness angle
Copyright © 2006-2009 John Gorentz. All rights reserved.